ESPN declined Thursday to answer a series of straightforward questions from OutKick/Fox News Digital about Dianna Russini's coverage of NFL head coach Mike Vrabel during her time at the network.
In an email, ESPN vice president of communications Derek Volner said: "We have no comment at this time. If that changes, we will let you know."
That response came after we asked whether ESPN was aware of any personal relationship between Russini and Vrabel while Russini worked there.
We also asked:
SAGE STEELE RECALLS HOW STEPHEN A SMITH WARNED HER AGAINST SPEAKING OUT WHILE STILL AT ESPN
Those are fair questions. In pictures exclusively obtained by the New York Post and published via Page Six, Vrabel and Russini were spotted together inside a bar in March 2020.
"They were kissing and they were all over each other," an eyewitness told the New York Post. "He had a ring on."
MIKE VRABEL AND DIANNA RUSSINI SEEN KISSING AT NYC BAR IN NEWLY SURFACED 2020 PHOTOS: REPORT
The timing matters because Russini was still at ESPN then, not at her later stop with The Athletic. The NFL reporter joined ESPN in 2015 (moving to the NFL beat in 2017) and left in 2023.
And ESPN's own record makes clear that Vrabel and the Titans were part of Russini's beat. In a 2021 press release announcing Russini's contract extension, ESPN highlighted her interview with "Titans' head coach Mike Vrabel and All-Pro running back Derrick Henry" ahead of the AFC Championship and noted that she was first to report Julio Jones signing with Tennessee. In 2023, ESPN's NFL Draft coverage plan listed Russini as the reporter stationed with the Titans in their war room.
Vrabel spent six seasons in Tennessee from 2018-2023, putting her Titans' reporting during that time into question.
That's what turns this into an ESPN story, not just a tabloid one.
JORDON HUDSON SHARES CRITICAL FEEDBACK TOWARD PODCASTERS AFTER TENSE PHONE CALL REVELATION
The public doesn't need ESPN to weigh in on anyone's private marriage, which is why we didn't ask about either Russini or Vrabel's personal situation. We asked questions to which the public deserves answers: did a reporter covering the league have a personal connection to a coach she covered, was that situation disclosed to ESPN management, and were any safeguards put in place? ESPN elected not to answer any of those questions.
That silence stands out because Disney's Standards of Business Conduct say employees should "act responsibly" in professional relationships and avoid situations where a conflict, or even an apparent conflict, exists between the company's interests and their own personal interests. A separate Disney journalistic-integrity brief says ESPN's mission is to provide "credible, timely, contextual, and trustworthy information," supported by detailed editorial guidelines and oversight from the ESPN Editorial Board.
Maybe ESPN knew about the situation and handled it properly. Maybe it determined there was nothing to disclose. Maybe it reviewed the matter and found no breach of policy. But by refusing to answer even the most basic disclosure-and-recusal questions, the network is asking the public to simply trust that its internal standards worked exactly as intended. That's a tough ask given that this isn't the first time the network's credibility has come into question. Far from it.
NFL COMMISSIONER ROGER GOODELL FACES MULTIPLE QUESTIONS OVER GIANTS CO-OWNER'S EMAILS WITH JEFFREY EPSTEIN
While everyone focuses on the responses by Russini, Vrabel, The Athletic, the New England Patriots and all the current figures in this scandal, we must not forget about the one that seems to have played a central role from the very beginning.
ESPN has its own questions to answer, but so far, it won't.
